![]() ![]() ![]() Proponents of an originally independent document note numerous instances in the text of these chapters to suggest that they were essentially an apology and thus in “a special category of ancient Near Eastern literature in which the accession of a ruler whose right to the throne is somehow suspect is shown to have been in accordance with the will of the gods and therefore lawful.” 14 Difficulties with this position are seen in the inability of scholars to agree on the beginning (1 Sam 15:1 or 16:1 or 16:14) and ending points (2 Sam 5:10 6:23 7:29) of such a document and in the fact that an apologetic dimension to the presentation of David's story is observable beyond the bounds of this supposed document (cf. 13 The sympathetic portrayal of David in these chapters, showing him to be a zealous worshiper of the Lord who used his great abilities in unswervingly loyal service to the king, demonstrates that David was uniquely qualified to lead Israel following Saul's tragic death. Since the time of Rost's writings on 1, 2 Samuel, many scholars have accepted the assertion that these twenty-one chapters were originally an independent document written to defend David's right to rule following the death of King Saul. RISE-OF-DAVID STORIES (1 SAMUEL 16–2 SAMUEL 5). 2 Sam 8:15–18 20:23–25 23:8–39)-provide additional evidence that these sources were indeed utilized. The relatively heavy emphasis on the roles played by prophets in 1, 2 Samuel, as well as the inclusion of many technical details concerning events within David's reign-for example, lists of David's administrative personnel and key military officers (cf. Although it cannot be proven that the writer of 1, 2 Samuel used or even had access to any or all of these other documents, it is reasonable to consider them as possible or even probable sources for the information presented in the canonical book. ![]() 6 First Chronicles indicates that at least four other documents from the early monarchical period were available for later generations to study and use: the Court Records of King David (1 Chr 27:24), the Records of Samuel the Seer (29:29), the Records of Nathan the Prophet (29:29), and the Records of Gad the Seer (29:29). 2 Sam 1:18) suggests that at least one preexistent written source, the Book of Jashar, was used in creating the autographic text of 1, 2 Samuel. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |